How Hyperliquid’s insanely profitable airdrop launch modified the sport

Hyperliquid has been lauded for delivering the perfect and most profitable airdrop launch in crypto historical past again in November, by excluding VCs and rigorously encouraging neighborhood involvement.

Nonetheless, specialists warning that different initiatives making an attempt to repeat the decentralized change’s (DEX’s) launch technique are unlikely to appreciate the identical success.

Jae Sik Choi, an analyst at Greythorn Asset Administration informed Cointelegraph the choice to exclude enterprise capitalists and hone in on neighborhood involvement was a boon for the worth motion of HYPE post-airdrop and helped create the cult following the perpetuals DEX now enjoys on social media. 

“One of many foremost issues they bought straight was creating short-term synthetic demand by not having VCs — this forces them [VCs] to purchase the second the token involves market together with everybody else,” Choi stated. 

“They actually got here again to what crypto was initially, which is truthful launches. If the product is respectable and the launch is truthful, it’s virtually assured to pump it doesn’t matter what.”

Choi added that one of many lesser-known contributors to HYPE’s price-action was the HYPE Help Fund, a Hyperliquid entity devoted to purchasing again HYPE on the open market. 

“They baked it into the tokenomics in order that the Hyper Help Fund retains on shopping for day-after-day via the income the protocol earns. And proper now, within the Trump period, I don’t assume that will probably be ever a problem with regulators,” he stated. 

“That is constant demand that’s created from actual income, which is nice. Technically that is nonetheless synthetic demand, however funnily sufficient, it then creates natural demand from the market by making a FOMO flywheel.”

Nonetheless, he stated token buybacks will not be a golden ticket to up-only worth motion without end.

“It could solely final for therefore lengthy. It is like an Ouroboros impact.”

Hyperliquid selected to be “egalitarian”

Synthetix founder Kain Warwick informed Cointelegraph that Hyperliquid succeeded largely due to its egalitarian deal with rewarding early and dependable customers no matter their “dimension,” in addition to getting fortunate with timing.

“Hyperliquid constructed consideration and consciousness within the bear market. It could be a lot tougher for a brand new challenge to return out and do this now as a result of the noise ground is a lot increased,” stated Warwick. 

Warwick just lately made a similar move whereas elevating funds for his new platform Infinex, choosing a “patronage” mannequin that raised $68 million by promoting Patron NFTs direct to market on the identical worth to VCs as retail.

The technique goals to construct up a neighborhood that can take an ongoing curiosity within the challenge relatively than abandon it after VCs dump large allocations of tokens from the Totally Diluted Worth (FDV) provide.

“The large takeaway just isn’t doing these low-float, high-FDV, VC-led raises. By rewarding the early and ongoing customers it’s a chance to get extra precise individuals in.”

On Nov. 29, Hyperliquid launched its native HYPE token, airdropping 27.5% of the overall provide to simply over 94,000 customers. 

On launch, HYPE was value a complete of $1 billion. Nonetheless, the overall worth of this airdrop has since burgeoned to over $7.5 billion on the time of publication, making HYPE the only largest airdrop within the historical past of crypto.

Instantly within the wake of the airdrop on Nov. 30, Warwick declared that Hyperliquid might very properly “break the curse” of perp DEXs fading into obscurity after they drop their token, sometimes as a result of customers lack incentives to proceed utilizing the product on the identical scale after they’ve completed farming it. 

HYPE has outperformed different airdropped DEX tokens, together with the Ethereum DEX Uniswap (UNI), perp DEX dYdX (dYdX), Solana change aggregator Jupiter (JUP) and perps platform Aevo (Aevo).

Choi contrasted HYPE with the launch dynamics of Celestia, an information availability protocol that has been marred by allegations of insider OTC offers and for rewarding early buyers by launching at a particularly excessive fully-diluted valuation.

“In hindsight, we all know why TIA pumped is as a result of, on the aspect, the Celestia Basis was promoting TIA through OTC offers.”

“The second TGE [token generation event] occurred it scaled all the way in which as much as a 70% low cost in the marketplace for early buyers. By that time, the worth was already at $10. All of us knew what was going to occur subsequent; they had been going to quick the opposite finish to seize the earnings.”

“With Hyperliquid they will’t do this. They should purchase the stock first, then quick when it’s truly pumped,” Choi stated. 

It’ll be ‘actually exhausting’ to repeat Hyperliquid

Whereas many pundits — particularly those that obtained airdrops — have praised Hyperliquid for its beneficiant token distribution, Warwick stated different protocols ought to be cautious of giving out giant volumes of their native tokens to customers. 

“That is most likely not the lesson to study for everybody, proper? We’ve seen loads of different individuals attempt to do 30-plus p.c airdrops and it doesn’t work.”

“When you don’t have giga-attention in your product, then it’s going to be actually exhausting for that to be sustainable and also you simply create a downward worth spiral,” Warwick added.

In a Jan. 6 report, asset supervisor VanEck shared that Hyperliquid has been constantly increasing its dominance over the perp DEX ecosystem, from a ten% market share to a 70% market share inside a 12 months.

Except for launch dynamics and tokenomics, Choi stated one of many greatest causes Hyperliquid carried out properly was the truth that it provided a superb product that felt straightforward to make use of, had deep liquidity and excessive throughput in comparison with opponents similar to GMX. 

From a product perspective, Hyperliquid centered closely on throughput and rapidly started to outrank competitor decentralized perp exchanges together with GMX, Vertex Protocol and dYdX.

Based on VanEck, Hyperliquid can course of 100,000 orders per second, whereas most opponents like GMX and Vertex course of “a number of magnitudes much less.”

Moreover, VanEck famous that Hyperliquid provides a less expensive product with a decrease charge construction than its rivals. 

“It felt like I used to be buying and selling on Binance however with no KYC or AML. There was additionally the power to take increased danger trades with higher performance than different Perp DEXs,” stated Choi. 

Associated: Hyperliquid rolls out native staking on mainnet

“One of many massive the reason why Hyperliquid works rather well is as a result of it’s an order book-based change. In order that slippage problem and poisonous move you get on different DEXs isn’t actually related when it comes to arbitrage alternatives for market makers, as a result of they really want to assume in the event that they wish to manipulate the market.”

Hyperliquid suffers North Korea safety scare

Nonetheless, Hyperliquid courted controversy in late December when MetaMask safety researcher Tay Monahan shared that North Korea-linked hackers had been “testing” the platform since October. 

“Yall, DPRK doesn’t commerce. DPRK assessments,” Monahan said on X. 

North Korean hackers such because the Lazarus Group stole $1.3 billion worth of crypto in 2024, doubling their haul from 2023.

Monahan and others additionally famous issues round centralization, with Hyperliquid solely operating round 16 validators on the time of publication — which means that it may very well be extra simply attacked by a classy actor when in comparison with a decentralized community. 

And whereas centralization makes safety extra worrisome, Choi jested that there are underappreciated UX advantages that come from it as properly.

“Generally the centralization makes it manner higher.”

Journal: Comeback 2025 — Is Ethereum poised to catch up with Bitcoin and Solana?